VERSION|0.5.1|NAME|Steve|DATE|1358247950|CONTENT|Cross-wearing falls into the category of ignorable trivia, in my view. I take your point that it gives religion a special status to some extent, but it is a very small extent. If she&#039;d been actively proselytising, though...

I do think that the headline is misleading, concentrating as it does on the most trivial case, ignoring the much more substantive cases where discrimination has occurred. It is very very good news that these two in particular lost. It says something profound about the status of religion in relation to the wider law in this part of the world, something that we should be very proud of as a society, and something you might imagine would be the key point in the article. I&#039;ve never really had a problem with religion per se, only in the application of it to those who aren&#039;t part of it. That&#039;s what secularism is, and it is good to see we live in a largely secular system.|IP-ADDRESS|10.0.119.228, 217.36.222.79, 10.37.47.203|MODERATIONFLAG|