VERSION|0.5.1|NAME|Tesh|DATE|1359555541|CONTENT|I don&#039;t mind too much about mention of film as film often is controversial and/or is a common reference point at different levels for many people . But I do wish contributors like this, especially those who like  hinting at the supposed &#039;arrogance&#039; of science  would listen to programmes such as &quot;The Life Scientific&quot;. It would demolish the idiotic pictures in their own mind as to what it is, what it does, how it works. I don&#039;t write that as a scientist - what I know about any science would fit easliy onto my little finger-nail; it is the attitude I love that comes through the programme.  I can rarely listen to it in the morning it is broadcast but could kiss whoever invented iPlayer. Reminds me - some weeks ago some on here people mentioned the wonderful Sokal hoax - I managed to buy Sokal&#039;s &quot;After the Hoax&quot; from &quot;Postscript&quot; who deal in publisher&#039;s remainders -  for £6.something down from £20, brand new,mint-condition hardback ,and an absolute joy: reproduces the orignal essay with commentary for virtually every sentence and contains many other reflective essays by him. His &quot;Religion, Politics and Survival&#039; in Part 3 may interest many of you. |EMAIL|lornacrossman@yahoo.co.uk|IP-ADDRESS|86.172.174.99|MODERATIONFLAG|