VERSION|0.5.1|SUBJECT|Akhandadhi Das, a Vaishnav Hindu teacher and theologian |CONTENT|[b]Rating[/b] 5 out of 5 (Extraordinarily platitudinous)

[url=http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap130130.html][img=images/2013/01/pic130130.jpg popup=false float=right][/url]The [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p012qczg]Wonders of Life[/url] carefully explained how life absorbs large amounts of energy, stores that energy in mitochondria, uses it to maintain a proton gradient that can do work, and transforms large amounts of order into disorder, while retaining just sufficient excess of order over disorder to concentrate and pass on information and so build new life. This is all done in compliance with the laws of thermodynamics.

But science cannot explain the invisible magic bit. This isn't the fault of scientists. I'm sure scientists are every bit as clever as theologians, it's just a different type of cleverness. Scientists take evidence and test hypotheses against experiments. Theologians take evidence of invisible magic stuff and compare it in invisible magic experiments. This is why theology has turned out to be so much more useful than science. So you see, these are really just different ways of looking at the evidence.

Where does all that information come from? Obviously there is design and planning in life. It can't all just be created by random processes. This is how theologians have proved that the Invisible Magic Friend must exist.

I noticed this in my two spaniels. They clearly had different invisible magic bits. Then one of them died and it's invisible magic bit moved on. 

[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p014g11v]Listen/Read[/url]|CATEGORIES|23,38,39,17,27|IP-ADDRESS|94.168.119.214|CREATEDBY|admin|DATE|1359534079
