VERSION|0.5.1|NAME|Stonyground|DATE|1365782492|CONTENT|Why would any sane person think that a book that was a compilation of materials that were written between two and four thousand years ago, would have anything useful to say about a medical proceedure that became available in the late nineteen-seventies? The same question could be applied to astrophysics as well come to think of it, the presumption of Sacks is unbelievable, he actually thinks that he knows better than Stephen Hawking.|EMAIL|elizabeth@iww1967.wanadoo.co.uk|IP-ADDRESS|95.150.29.135|MODERATIONFLAG|